2010 May 11 – MA Board Meeting
The Silver Springs Non-Profit Property Management Corporation a.k.a. the “Master Association”
Monthly Board Meeting at St. Luke’s Episcopal Church
Possible Agenda:
1. Make plans to present the much disputed Feb. 9, 2010 assessment for $357 to the General Association Members for a vote as required in the various HOA and MA documents.
| If we were going to say that the MA 1990 DEVELOPERS DRAFT Bylaws were valid then we could quote ” Article III. Meeting of MEMBERS, Section 5A. Quorum. Fifty-percent (50%) or more of the Members, either present in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for any and all purposes, except in special assessment circumstances, in which the express provisions require a sixty-six and two-thirds (66 2/3%) percent vote of the members present.” This Article should not be confused to be instructions to the board trustees as members of the MA board because Article V provides instructions for the Meeting of TRUSTEES. This separation of Articles provides a division of Member types: – Association General Members – and Board Trustee Members.] |
|
SSSFHOA 1982 CCRS. Section 4. Special Assessments for Capital Improvements. In addition to the regular assessments authorized above, the Association may levy, in any assessment year, a special assessment for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction, repair or replacement of a capital improvement upon the Common Area, including fixtures and personal property related thereto, provided that any such assessment shall have the assent of a two-thirds majority of the combined votes of both classes of membership entitled to vote and who are voting in person or by proxy at a meeting duly called for this purpose. |
|
SSSFHOA 1985 CCRS. Article V. Section 4. Special Assessments. In addition to the regular assessments authorized above, the Association may levy special assessments for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction or reconstruction, repair or replacement of a capital improvement upon the common area, including fixtures and personal property related thereto, or costs incurred for any other Association purpose, provided that any such assessment shall have the assent of a majority of the Members entitled to vote at a meeting duly called for this purpose. Written notice of such meeting shall be sent to all Members not less than ten (10) calendar days or more than thirty (30) calendar days in advance of the meeting. |
|
SSSFHOA 1994 Compiled CCRS. Article IV. PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE COMMON AREAS Section 1. Members Easements of Enjoyment. Every Member shall have a right and easement o f enjoyment in and to the common area, if any, and such easement shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to every Assessed lot, subject to the following provisions: (a) The right of the Association to establish uniform rules and Article V. Section 4. Special Assessments for Capital Improvements. In addition to the regular assessments authorized above the Association may levy special assessments for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction or reconstruction, repair or replacement of a capital improvement upon the common area, including fixtures and personal property related thereto, or costs incurred for any other Association purpose, provided that any such assessments shall have the assent of a majority of the membership entitled to vote at a meeting duly called for this purpose. Written notice of such meeting shall be sent to all members not less than ten (10) calendar days not more than thirty (30) calendar days in advance of the meeting. |
1994 is a Compilation of SSSFHOA CCRS. Put together four years after the MA started.
In March of 2008 the MA “manager” sent these to the Webmaster as the MA CCRs.
2. Discuss the division of individual subdivision members into three categories that would create tiered assessments without conflicting with the individual subdivisions’ Bylaws or CCRs. This would also be responsive to the long held majority wishes of the property owners. The Condo-Townhomes would be assessed for the Tennis Court parcel, the General Members that are non-lake view owners would be assessed for the Park maintenance, the Lake view owners would be assessed for the lakes.
3. Discuss the true situation of the “MA” Bylaws. Since they are not complete, not formalized, not approved by the vote of the Homeowners, should the Articles of Incorporation be updated as the only legal document for the management of the Common Areas within Silver Springs.